The Navier-Stokes equations describe how fluids move. They govern air, water, blood, weather, and turbulence.
But this site isn't about whether the equations work. They do, and they are extraordinarily successful in applications. The real question is the one behind the Clay Millennium Prize: if you start with a perfectly smooth 3D flow, does it stay smooth forever? Or can it blow up?
Nobody knows. That's what makes this problem extraordinary.
Below, we break the subject into distinct paths: the equations themselves, the current solved-or-open status, the formal Clay problem statement, the mathematical obstacles, standard reductions, and the proof strategies people have tried.
This site is centered on the 3D incompressible Navier-Stokes global regularity problem on R3 or T3.
The equation is
∂tu+(u⋅∇)u=−∇p+νΔu,∇⋅u=0.
In the Clay setting, we consider smooth divergence-free initial data, either rapidly decaying on R3 or smooth periodic on T3. The question: does such data always produce a unique global smooth solution, or can smoothness break down in finite time? Leray's 1934 theory gives global weak solutions. Global smoothness and uniqueness in three dimensions? Still open.
The sections below separate the PDE itself, the formal Clay statement, the scaling obstacles, the standard subproblems, and the approaches that have shaped the field.